Profile
Ron has tried hundreds of real estate and business cases in over 30 years of practice. In recent cases, he successfully defended a shopping center landlord in a multimillion-dollar class-action lawsuit brought by over 165 tenants, obtained a jury verdict of general and punitive damages in excess of $450,000 for a small business owner, and prevailed at trial in defense of longtime San Jose farmers sued by a powerful national developer for their family ranch (worth $40 million). Ron has been writing his biweekly San Jose Mercury News column, "Real Law," since 1995.
Articles about Ronald Rossi appearing in Super Lawyers
Old Lawyers Can Learn New Tricks
Ronald Rossi goes back to college in his 50s
About Ronald Rossi
Admitted: 1969, California
Professional Webpage: www.rhrc.net/Bio/RonaldRossi.asp
Bar/Professional Activity:
- State Bar of California Santa Clara County Bar Association
Santa Clara County Trial Lawyers' Association
Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Pro Tem Program
Department of Real Estate Committee on Dual Agency
Department of Real Estate Sub-Committee on Dual Agency Disclosure Forms
Former Chairman Housing Industry Foundation
Board Member California Associations of Realtors Committees: Legal Affairs, Dual Agency, Legal Action Fund
Scholarly Lectures and Writings:
- "Advanced Property Management", Foothill and DeAnza Colleges"Advanced Real Estate Law", Foothill and DeAnza Colleges"Real Estate Syndications", Foothill and DeAnza CollegesLecturer, "Real Estate Remedies", University of California, BerkeleyLecturer, "Representing Parties to Real Property Sales Transactions", University of California, BerkeleyLecturer, "Preliminary Title Reports, Title Policies, and Closing Procedures", University of California, Berkeley
- Author, Real Law columns, San Jose Mercury News, 1995
Verdicts and Settlements:
- (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case # 1-03-CV-817085, Court of Appeal, Sixth District Case # H029830). Successfully represented a Court-ordered Receiver in a case against a major insurer for its failure to pay complete coverage on a fire insurance policy. The insurance company's adjuster had referred the Receiver to a contractor allegedly on its approved contractor's list. The Receiver hired the contractor to perform the fire damage repairs on the insurance carrier's recommendation. The contractor walked off the job, absconding with a portion of the insurance benefits which had been paid. The carrier then refused to pay further policy benefits and denied further coverage, refusing to pay even the policy benefits it had agreed were owing forcing the Receiver to hire a new contractor funded by Receiver certificates. After a two-week jury trial, the jury awarded damages plus $1.5 million in punitive damages. After the Receiver then successfully moved for an award of attorney's fees, a total judgment of $2.1 million was entered against the insurance company. The award was successfully affirmed on appeal in a published decision.
Educational Background:
- San Jose State University,M.A.Major: History , 2009