Georgia native Philip C. Henry is a senior partner at Henry Spiegel Milling LLC in Atlanta. With more than 30 years of legal experience, he concentrates on injury and wrongful death cases involving car accidents, tractor-trailer collisions, construction accidents, defective products, medical malpractice, defective roadways and other personal injury situations.

Mr. Henry has a proven record of success for his injured clients. He has obtained several settlements and trial verdicts in excess of $1 million. He served as lead counsel in the much publicized case of Brown v. The Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority, which resulted in a jury verdict award of $14,915,670.

Philip Henry's dedication to professional excellence is widely recognized. He was elected to The American College of Trial Lawyers, an elite national organization limited to the top one percent of attorneys from each state. He has also been selected for inclusion in the Super Lawyers listing every year of its existence, named in The Best Lawyers in America for 14 years in a row and was twice voted by other Georgia attorneys as one of the "top 10" lawyers in the state.

For 20 consecutive years, Mr. Henry has received the highest possible peer-review rating available from Martindale-Hubbell* for legal ability, as well as commitment to ethical standards. Frequently, other injury lawyers in Atlanta refer cases to him because of his experience, knowledge and track record of success.

He holds membership in a number of professional organizations, including the American Association for Justice, American College of Trial Lawyers, Georgia Trial Lawyers Association and Lawyers Club of Atlanta.

Mr. Henry routinely speaks to other Atlanta personal injury attorneys about trial work and his success in representing personal injury victims at various seminars.

_{*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.}