Attorney Profile

Richard D. Goff

Richard Goff

Henschel Moberg Goff, P.A.
100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1500
Minneapolis, MN 55401

Minneapolis

Minnesota (MN)

612-326-6000
612-333-1200

Selections

Selected To Super Lawyers: 2003 - 2014

Historical data is only available from 2003
Selected to Super Lawyers for 12 years

Practice Areas

Family Law

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Profile

As a partner and shareholder at Henschel Moberg Goff, P.A., located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Richard D. Goff brings nearly 50 years of legal experience to a diverse family law practice. He focuses on a variety of related matters, including traditional contested and amicable divorces, high-asset divorce, spousal maintenance, child support, child custody, nonmarital property issues, alternative dispute resolution, divorce mediation, dissolution cases that involve business valuation or tax issues and valuation services for closely held businesses. Mr. Goff also serves as a mediator and as a consensual special magistrate under Section 484.74 of the 2013 Minnesota Statutes, and the geographical areas that he serves include the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the counties of Ramsey and Hennepin, outlying areas of the Twin Cities metropolitan region and the remainder of the state of Minnesota.

After earning his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and Cornell University in 1961, Mr. Goff attended the University of Minnesota Law School, from which he earned his Bachelor of Laws in 1964. He is a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association and is admitted to practice before the state courts of that jurisdiction. In addition, Mr. Goff is an active participant in the Ramsey County Bar Association, the Hennepin County Bar Association and the American Bar Association.

Mr. Goff has earned several distinctions during his career. Highly regarded by his peers, he has been named in The Best Lawyers in America* every year since 1987 and has been on the list of Leading American Attorneys since 1994 and has also been given an AV Preeminent** rating by Martindale-Hubbell.

*The Best Lawyers in America® 2010. Copyright 2009 by Woodward/White, Inc., Aiken, SC

**AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties, Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of the peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.


Find Me Online


About Richard Goff

Law School: University of Minnesota Law School

Admitted: 1964, Minnesota

Professional Webpage: www.henschelmoberg.com

Honors and Awards:

  • The Best Lawyers in America, 1987 - Present
  • Leading American Attorneys, 1994 - Present

Bar/Professional Activity:

  • Minnesota, 1964
  • Member, Ramsey County Bar Association
  • Member, Hennepin County Bar Association
  • Member, Minnesota State Bar Association
  • Member, American Bar Association

Representative Clients:

  • Rydell v. Rydell, 310 N.W.2d 112, Minn., September 18, 1981 (NO. 50882)
  • Janssen v. Janssen, 331 N.W.2d 752, Minn., April 01, 1983 (NO. C0-82-102)
  • Auge v. Auge, 334 N.W.2d 393, Minn., June 03, 1983 (NO. CX-82-1323)
  • Mathias v. Mathias, 365 N.W.2d 293, Minn. App., April 02, 1985 (NO. C7-84-2014)
  • Moylan v. Moylan, 368 N.W.2d 353, Minn. App., May 28, 1985 (NO. C2-84-2177)
  • Moylan v. Moylan, 384 N.W.2d 859, Minn., April 11, 1986 (NO. C2-84-2177)
  • Valento v. Valento, 385 N.W.2d 860, Minn. App., April 22, 1986 (NO. C9-85-1683)
  • O'Connor v. O'Connor, 386 N.W.2d 395, Minn. App., May 06, 1986 (NO. C1-85-2214)
  • Galman v. Galman, 387 N.W.2d 680, Minn. App., June 03, 1986 (NO. C2-85-2173)
  • Coakley v. Coakley, 400 N.W.2d 436, 87 A.L.R.4th 339, Minn. App., February 10, 1987 (NO. C8-86-728, C2 86 1003, C8-86-1331)
  • Lunde v. Lunde, 408 N.W.2d 888, Minn. App., June 30, 1987 (NO. C9-86-1709)
  • Fuller v. Glover, 414 N.W.2d 222, Minn. App., October 27, 1987 (NO. C9-87-1025)
  • Frye v. Frye, 1988 WL 6224, Minn. App., February 02, 1988 (NO. C7-87-1279)
  • Collins v. Madgy, 1988 WL 24794, Minn. App., March 22, 1988 (NO. C9-87-2160)
  • Moylan v. Moylan, 423 N.W.2d 402, 1988 WL 47088, Minn. App., May 17, 1988 (NO. C6-87-2133)
  • Hand v. Kuutti, 423 N.W.2d 715, 1988 WL 50205, Minn. App., May 24, 1988 (NO. C9-88-94)
  • Bone v. Bone, 438 N.W.2d 448, 1989 WL 35633, Minn. App., April 18, 1989 (NO. C3-88-2519)
  • Buchanan v. Buchanan, 1989 WL 55454, Minn. App., May 30, 1989 (NO. CX-88-1979)
  • Yount v. Yount, 1989 WL 103249, Minn. App., September 12, 1989 (NO. CX-89-311)
  • Zamberletti v. Zamberletti, 1989 WL 131558, Minn. App., November 07, 1989 (NO. C3-89-411)
  • Robertson v. Robertson, 1989 WL 135427, Minn. App., November 14, 1989 (NO. C1-89-942)
  • Katter v. Katter, 457 N.W.2d 750, 1990 WL 89658, Minn. App., July 03, 1990 (NO. C9-89-1899)
  • Beck v. Beck, 1991 WL 10229, Minn. App., February 05, 1991 (NO. C4-90-1959)
  • Doyle v. Doyle, 1991 WL 26064, Minn. App., March 05, 1991 (NO. C2-90-1443)
  • Stern v. Stern, 1991 WL 271552, Minn. App., December 24, 1991 (NO. C8-91-1067)
  • Stern v. Stern, 1992 WL 10729, Minn. App., January 28, 1992 (NO. C8-91-1487)
  • Boisclair v. Boisclair, 1992 WL 183001, Minn. App., August 04, 1992 (NO. C8-91-2154)
  • Gessner v. Gessner, 487 N.W.2d 921, 1992 WL 196555, Minn. App., August 18, 1992 (NO. C1-92-708)
  • Ayers v. Ayers, 494 N.W.2d 306, 1993 WL 505, Minn. App., January 05, 1993 (NO. C1-92-997)
  • Sanborn v. Sanborn, 503 N.W.2d 499, 1993 WL 265204, Minn. App., July 20, 1993 (NO. C5-92-2140)
  • Ciresi v. Ciresi, 1993 WL 276861, Minn. App., July 27, 1993 (NO. C1-93-282)
  • Muscanto v. Muscanto, 1993 WL 290254, Minn. App., August 03, 1993 (NO. C3-93-395)
  • Coakley v. Coakley, 1993 WL 302136, Minn. App., August 10, 1993 (NO. C0-93-516)
  • Ayers v. Ayers, 508 N.W.2d 515, 1993 WL 475418, Minn., November 19, 1993 (NO. C1-92-997)
  • In re Marriage of Phillips v. Phillips, 1994 WL 567591, Minn. App., October 18, 1994 (NO. C7-94-555)
  • Hallowell v. Hallowell, 1995 WL 238891, Minn. App., April 25, 1995 (NO. C3-94-2383)
  • In re Marriage of Heffelfinger v. Heffelfinger, 1996 WL 453562, Minn. App., August 13, 1996 (NO. C2-96-189)
  • In re Solomon, 1996 WL 481532, Minn. App., August 27, 1996 (NO. C6-96-308)
  • In re Marriage of Storbeck v. Storbeck, 1996 WL 679706, Minn. App., November 26, 1996 (NO. C0-96-904)
  • In re Marriage of Sommers v. Sommers, 1997 WL 328035, Minn. App., June 17, 1997 (NO. C7-97-98)
  • In re Marriage of Snodgrass v. Snodgrass, 1997 WL 458164, Minn. App., August 12, 1997 (NO. C3-97-325)
  • In re Marriage of Storbeck, 1997 WL 536953, Minn. App., September 02, 1997 (NO. C5-97-634)
  • Gallion v. Gallion, 1997 WL 714731, Minn. App., November 18, 1997 (NO. C6-97-240)
  • Miller v. Miller, 1998 WL 40505, Minn. App., February 03, 1998 (NO. C0-97-1061)
  • Liebscher v. Liebscher, 1998 WL 268087, Minn. App., May 26, 1998 (NO. CX-97-1620)
  • Storbeck v. Storbeck, 1998 WL 389075, Minn. App., July 14, 1998 (NO. C7-97-2353)
  • Weinmeyer v. Weinmeyer, 1999 WL 43345, Minn. App., February 02, 1999 (NO. C7-98-1262)
  • Conlan v. Conlan, 1999 WL 410308, Minn. App., June 22, 1999 (NO. C0-98-2219)
  • Storbeck v. Storbeck, 1999 WL 711063, Minn. App., September 14, 1999 (NO. CX-99-424)
  • In re Marriage of Liebscher, 1999 WL 1216917, Minn. App., December 21, 1999 (NO. C4-99-998, C9-99-995)
  • Barlage v. Barlage, 2000 WL 31799, Minn. App., January 18, 2000 (NO. C2-99-711, CX-99-746)
  • Gooderum v. Gooderum, 2002 WL 31749169, Minn. App., December 10, 2002 (NO. C1-02-730)
  • Crump v. Krantz, 2004 WL 557295, Minn. App., March 23, 2004 (NO. A03-1235)
  • In re marriage of Tori, 2004 WL 1444944, Minn. App., June 29, 2004 (NO. A03-1124)
  • Zamberletti v. Zamberletti, 2004 WL 2857532, Minn. App., December 14, 2004 (NO. A04-562)
  • Conner v. Conner, 2005 WL 1153622, Minn. App., May 17, 2005 (NO. A04-1141)
  • Rosenblum v. Rosenblum, 2006 WL 1738061, Minn. App., June 27, 2006 (NO. A05-1366)
  • In re Marriage of Goldman, 725 N.W.2d 747, 2007 WL 3597, Minn. App., January 02, 2007 (NO. A06-1110)
  • Humphrey v. Humphrey, 2007 WL 1674213, Minn. App., June 12, 2007 (NO. A06-934)
  • Baker v. Baker, 733 N.W.2d 815, 2007 WL 1893201, Minn. App., July 03, 2007 (NO. A06-1252)
  • Moore v. Moore, 734 N.W.2d 285, 2007 WL 1977146, Minn. App., July 10, 2007 (NO. A06-1504)
  • Goldman v. Greenwood, 748 N.W.2d 279, 2008 WL 821011, Minn., March 27, 2008 (NO. A06-1110)
  • Markoe v. Markoe, 2008 WL 1748176, Minn. App., April 15, 2008 (NO. A07-0520)
  • Baker v. Baker, 753 N.W.2d 644, 2008 WL 2522585, Minn., June 26, 2008 (NO. A061252)
  • Baker v. Baker, 2008 WL 5135117, Minn. App., December 09, 2008 (NO. A06-1252R)

Educational Background:

  • University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, LL.B., 1964
  • Cornell University, New York
  • University of Minnesota, Minnesota, B.A., 1961
Call me at 612-326-6000

To: Richard D. Goff

Super Lawyers: Potential Client Inquiry









Captcha Image Listen and type the characters you hear

Load another picture


DISCLAIMER: If you send a lawyer or law firm email through this service, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via this email service. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties. Super Lawyers will not retain a copy of this message.



Map Location

Super Lawyers Magazine
What is Super Lawyers

Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations.

Read more »

 

Find Us On

International

Super Lawyers UK Super Lawyers US