Noncompete & Nonsolicitation: How Are They Different In California?Sponsored Answer
In many states, employers include noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements in employment contracts. These terms are designed to protect their business interests and restrict competition from former employees.
California has the strictest laws in terms of limiting employee movement of any state in the country. However, while California law generally bans the enforcement of noncompete agreements, nonsolicitation agreements can still be valid under specific circumstances.
What Are Noncompete And Nonsolicitation Agreements?
Noncompete agreements prevent employees from engaging in direct competition with their employer in a given industry, either during or after their period of employment. This includes both working for a competitor in a subsequent position or starting a business in the same field. Noncompete agreements generally apply only for a limited period of time, in a certain geographic region or both.
Nonsolicitation agreements are slightly different. While they allow employees to continue working in the same industry at a different company, they prevent the employee from using customer lists and other protected knowledge or trade secrets from their previous employer.
When Do Noncompete And Nonsolicitation Agreements Apply In California?
In general, noncompete agreements are not enforceable in California. Even if the employer is based in another state in which noncompete agreements are enforced, California employees are not subject to these terms. In many circumstances, employers run the risk of invalidating their entire employment contract by including noncompete clauses for California employees.
Unlike noncompete agreements, nonsolicitation agreements can still apply in specific situations. However, a recent appeals court decision will make it more difficult for businesses to pursue legal action against former employees who are engaging in alleged nonsolicitation.
In AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc., the court held that nonsolicitation agreements signed by employees who left the company are void and unenforceable. According to the ruling, nonsolicitation is an improper restraint of the employees’ right to practice their chosen profession.
The AMN decision will now make it extremely difficult for employers to restrict their former California employees from competing with them. Prior to establishing a nonsolicitation agreement, employers in California should first consult with an attorney experienced practicing contract law.
Other Answers By Alton G. Burkhalter
To: Alton G. Burkhalter
Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).
The information contained in this web site is intended to convey general information. It should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. It is not an offer to represent you, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The use of the internet or this contact form for communication is not necessarily a secure environment. Contacting a lawyer or law firm email through this service will not create an attorney-client relationship, and information will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential.