Autonomous Car Crashes: Who is to Blame?

For now, it’s humans; but it may soon be the car manufacturers

By

Imagine if, one morning on the way to work, you stop in a queue of cars at a red light. Suddenly a car from behind slams into you. When you gather yourself and confront the other driver, you’re surprised to see the seat empty and, instead, see passengers in the back seat of an autonomous, or self-driving, taxi.

Who pays for the damage and injuries? Who is at fault? As self-driving cars become more prolifically available, several legal issues arise.

“It’s too early to tell if these cars will make it safer out there,” says David Bulluck, a personal injury attorney in Temple Terrace who handled an accident case involving an automated Tesla, “and either way, this will be more and more of an issue the more they get out on the roads.”

Tech Takes the Roads

In the last few months of 2017, autonomous cars were unleashed onto the public roads of the United States in Arizona, California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Michigan, and many countries abroad. A company called Waymo (a Google spin-off) has a fleet of over 100 autonomous taxis operating in Scottsdale, Arizona, with plans to expand to more than 500 in 2018 and beyond. Uber and Lyft both have pilot programs running in various places, and every major car company has plans and dates for the release of their version of the autonomous car.

The research on autonomous cars points to various changes in liability, and auto industry leaders like Volvo are taking notice as this technology takes to the roads. Here’s what the research says:

  • There will likely be a shift to product liability, making car companies primarily liable for accidents caused by their autonomous cars. Court battles in such cases will likely center around two key questions: Would a reasonable design change have prevented the crash? Would a human driver or another automated system have performed better in the situation in question?
  • Personal injury claims will likely be focused on the unreliability of automated systems. If the human victim wins that case, the damage claims could be higher than with user-driven claims, simply because of the extensive documentation of the events by the cameras on the automated car.

Most accidents on the roads today are caused by driver error, drunk driving and speeding. These should be taken out of the equation with self-driving cars, which are controlled through computer sensors and programing, but we’re not quite there yet.

The Accidents Thus Far: Humans Still at Fault

An autonomous shuttle bus made headlines in Las Vegas for getting in a crash within two hours of being on the road—though it was later determined that the human driver of the truck that collided with the bus caused the accident. An autonomous taxi trying to avoid road debris hit a bus in Arizona, and Uber suspended its expansion after an automated accident—also in Arizona.

At the moment none of the autonomous cars on the roads are fully driverless. They may be in autonomous mode, but have a driver behind the wheel tasked with making any necessary corrections. As of now, the driver is at fault for not correcting the system.

The current investigations have not changed from a car that has a full time human driving the car. Police will investigate if any laws were broken and issue citations as appropriate. In some cases, the autonomous car’s cameras may be available to clarify what happened and make investigations easier.

The first driver fatality with an autonomous vehicle occurred in Florida and involved a white truck and a Tesla. The truck went in front of the Tesla, which was in cruise control at 74 mph, but the Tesla sensors didn’t recognize it—possibly due to its color—and hit the truck. The Tesla driver was deemed at fault for failing to correct the automated car’s actions.

“Cases with these cars are going to get more expensive,” says Bulluck, who is handling a different crash case that involves a Tesla. He points to the incredible amount of information that these automated cars can capture, even while not in self-driving mode. “Tesla cars have cameras that activate and take pictures at the time of the impact. They record and log that data and also hold the key to interpreting that data.”

Bulluck has hired engineers to talk with Tesla’s team to collect that data. As for if it’s a helpful tool, Bullock says, “It depends what side you are on.”

If ever you find yourself in an automated car crash, consider talking to a reputable personal injury attorney as well as a reputable products liability attorney. They will help you get compensated by the driver or auto manufacturer for any injuries you sustain.  

Florida

At the moment none of the autonomous cars on the roads are fully driverless. They may be in autonomous mode, but have a driver behind the wheel tasked with making any necessary corrections. As of now, the driver is at fault for not correcting the system.

Other Featured Articles

Same-Sex Common Law Marriage in Colorado

Marriage may be retroactive—even before it was considered legal

 

The Penalties of Delaware’s Blue Sky Laws

How securities law violations are enforced on the state level

 

Stop and Frisk in Texas: Is It Legal?

What are my rights if I’m stopped and questioned?

 

See More Legal Issue Articles »

Share:
Page Generated: 0.27219796180725 sec