Attractive Nuisances: Shocking Liabilities for Homeowners

If a child gets hurt playing on your property, you could be responsible for their injuries

By

Parents want their children to have a great home. If they have the means, who doesn’t want to install a pool, buy a trampoline, build a treehouse, or erect a skateboard ramp in the backyard? It may sound nice, but thanks to the attractive nuisance doctrine, parents may be opening themselves up to liabilities despite their good intentions.

What is the law?

The doctrine allows a child to file a lawsuit and seek damages if they were hurt on someone else’s property—even if they weren’t given permission to be there. A child who trespasses onto another’s property because of an attractive nuisance and who is injured by that attractive nuisance can be compensated for his or her injuries if:

  1. The landowner knows or has reason to know that children are likely to trespass (for example, an unfenced pool area or pond);
  2. The landowner knows or should have reason to know the nuisance involves an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to a child (a boulder wall or a trampoline);
  3. Children can be unlikely to realize the danger they are in by coming near the nuisance;
  4. The burden on the landowner of eliminating or mitigating the danger is slight compared to the danger presented to children; and
  5. The landowner fails to take reasonable measures to eliminate the danger or protect children.

What needs to be done to protect my property from liability?

Problems with trespassing kids may be preventable with fences or locks, but ultimately there may be nothing you can do. The question for a judge or jury in deciding these cases is what a reasonable person would do. Would they put in a fence, lock a door, or put netting around a trampoline? Saying the cost was a burden may not be a sufficient defense. Know, however, that doing some kind of preventative measure will look much better than nothing at all.

Why is the law in place?

Children are naturally excitable, and may play on or in things that a bit dangerous. Younger humans can often put themselves in hazardous situations without thinking about the consequences. Because of this, adults that control properties become responsible; they must ensure their property is safe.

Cases from around the United States show that it isn’t just pools that can be dangerous: old refrigerators, unattended fires, ladders on trains, and scooters and bikes can be hazardous.

The attractive nuisance doctrine is fairly broad, so property owners need to take steps to protect both themselves and the children that may be coming onto their property—even if they don’t have permission to do so. If a trespassing child is hurt on your property, be certain to call a reputable and experienced personal injury defense attorney.

Massachusetts

Problems with trespassing kids may be preventable with fences or locks, but ultimately there may be nothing you can do. The question for a judge or jury in deciding these cases is what a reasonable person would do.

Other Featured Articles

Accommodations for Breastfeeding Under the PDA

Post-pregnancy worker rights in Georgia

 

When Are Bonuses Not Discretionary?

What to do if you’ve got unpaid, earned bonuses in Minnesota

 

Full Disclosure on NDAs

Three New York employment lawyers walk you through the basics

 

See More Legal Issue Articles »

Page Generated: 0.2975959777832 sec