Skip to main content

When to Consider Mediation in a Business Dispute

Getting the skinny from alternative dispute resolution specialists

Mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (such as arbitration) have been growing in popularity for years—and the vast majority of cases are now resolved this way. But Gene Esshaki recalls doing it before it was cool—or formally recognized.

“A judge would call me up and say, ‘Look, this case has got a real problem. You know the two lawyers. Would you sit down and talk to them to see if you can’t help me out on this, get it resolved?’” recalls Esshaki, an ADR attorney at Abbott Nicholson in Detroit. “That’s how we used to do mediations. Now it’s formally certified by the courts.” 

The approach is simple: The parties and their attorneys agree on a neutral third party, then take a seat at the negotiation table. “Both sides have to accept that they must negotiate and compromise, and agree to a settlement,” says Jerome F. Rock, a mediator and arbitrator in Grosse Pointe Park. “There are perhaps hundreds of permutations of involving a neutral third party in a conflict. But with mediation, specifically, I’ve seen the shift in attitudes for it since the first formal training in Michigan back in 2002. Since then, it has really become high on the radar of not only attorneys but businesspeople. Certainly anyone who has been in litigation is anxious to pursue alternatives.”

Esshaki says business conflicts are especially well-suited for mediation. Commercial contracts have commonly called for arbitration, Rock adds. But the American Arbitration Association also has a provision to divert cases to mediations and businesses are increasingly calling for mediation in their contracts.

The biggest advantage, Esshaki notes, is “tremendous cost savings.” Time is money, and mediation commonly saves both—although, it can vary. “When I start a case, I never know how long it may take. Is it going to take three hours? Is going to take eight hours? Will we have to come back another time? I simply do not know,” he says. 

How it shakes out often depends on the type of case, Rock says. “The no-fault auto cases are really down to a streamlined pattern. Both sides have learned the game, and usually have it done in two to four hours. Business cases tend to be more specialized,” he says. 

Both Rock and Esshaki say the majority of cases can be resolved in one session, “but you can’t be 100% on anything,” Rock says. “So if not, we don’t want them to give up hope, so we assess what needs to be accomplished before we reconvene. A breather might be needed—high emotions need to be cooled. It might be more facts or resources are needed. There are a host of reasons why it might not conclude in one session, but that’s the expectation.”

The other big advantage, says Esshaki, is risk management.

“If you’ve been sued for a million dollars and you’re going to take it to court and there’s a jury, the jury is going to make the determination that you owe $1 million, or zero, or anything in between. These are strangers to your business—just ordinary residents of the community who are going to decide. That’s not good risk management. Once you turn it over to a jury, you have no impact whatsoever on the results.”

As for how to find a good mediator, Esshaki says an experienced attorney will know several to suggest. Commonly, one side will suggest some names to the other and pick one; or, if they don’t like the list, they’ll provide a list of their own. “Generally, there’s never any problem for good lawyers to pick a good mediator,” he adds.

Other than experience and reputation, clients are increasingly looking for subject matter expertise in a mediator. “In 2002, the training protocol did not acknowledge the advantage of specialized skills or knowledge of the mediator, but now they do,” says Rock. “Over the past 19 years, I’ve seen the needle change dramatically. Now people are looking for mediators with subject matter qualifications—in the IT field, in construction, and in different industries like automotive, for example.”

In the end, the concept sells itself. 

“Litigation is likely to end in dissatisfaction and disappointment by both sides,” says Rock. “A lot of times businesses are looking to minimize the total cost, so they don’t have to win on every issue. It’s often more important to have a quick resolution, and mediation is just that.”

Other Featured Articles

Business/Corporate Icon Business/Corporate

What Can Be Done About Ransomware Attacks?

Legal advice from New York data security attorneys

Business/Corporate Icon Business/Corporate

When to Consider Mediation in a Business Dispute

Getting the skinny from alternative dispute resolution specialists

Business/Corporate Icon Business/Corporate

The Care and Feeding of Nonprofits

How to start and nurture one in Northern California

View More Business & Corporate Articles »

Page Generated: 0.20032095909119 sec