An Overview on Defamation Law

When your reputation is harmed by someone else's false statement

The law protects people’s right to speak freely, but it also seeks to prevent people from having their lives ruined by someone’s statements. When someone makes a false statement about you that harms your reputation or affects your ability to make a living, you might be able to sue them for defamation.

If you think someone has said something defamatory about you—or even if someone sued you for saying something defamatory—the following overview can help you evaluate your case. It discusses how you prove a case, and common defenses. This way, you will have a basic understanding of the legal framework for your case when you sit down with your lawyer for the first time.

Overview

Defamation is a false statement that harms someone’s reputation. There are two type of defamation: libel and slander. Generally, libel is written and slander is spoken. The split isn’t always that clear, however. For example, a defamatory radio broadcast, while spoken, is libel. Whether spoken or written, libel or slander, you will use the same approach to prove your case and the same defenses will be available.

What to Prove

If you would like to sue someone for defamation, you will need to prove that they made a false statement of fact to a third party. You will also need to prove some level of fault (at the very least, negligence) and that the false statement caused you some kind of harm.

False statement

Legally, true statements cannot be defamatory even if the truth affects your standing in the community. The statement must also be a statement of fact—an unflattering opinion isn’t enough. That means that someone saying they think you are a jerk isn’t defamation, even if it changes the way people see you. However, someone saying they think you stole from your employer can be defamation, even if it’s qualified with language that sounds like an opinion such as “I think.”

Third party

Whether written or spoken, if the false statement was read or heard by a third party, the statement has been “published.” If someone said something false about you to you and no one else, then you do not have a claim because the statement was not published.

Fault

This element will be slightly different depending on whether the subject of the defamatory statement is a public or private figure. If you are alleging defamation and you’re a private person, then you will likely only need to prove that the other party made the statement negligently. This can change in some circumstances, like if the statement was about a matter of public interest despite your status as a private person. If you are alleging defamation as a public official or public figure, you will need to prove something called actual malice. This means you will need to prove the person making the statement knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity of the statement.

Harm

Finally, you will need to prove you suffered harm because of the statement. In the world of defamation, this means you will be required to show damage to your reputation. If you already had a reputation for being a liar, someone falsely saying you lied may not rise to the level of defamation because it didn’t affect your reputation.

Defenses and Privileges

If you are being sued for defamation, your strongest defense will always be that the statement was true because a true statement—no matter how harmful—is not legally actionable. Your second best defense will be to allege that the plaintiff did not meet one of the necessary elements discussed above.

Another thing you may want to consider is privilege, which refers to the fact that sometimes an individual is immune from liability. Privilege is either absolute or qualified and applies more to the venue in which the statement was made than it does to the person who made the statement. For example, a witness in court enjoys absolute privilege from a defamation lawsuit for statements made during the proceedings. However, that privilege may not follow them to other areas of their life, even if they’re making the same statements. This is also true of legislators who enjoy a qualified privilege for potentially defamatory statements made during legislative proceedings. The qualified nature of this privilege means they can lose it and be held liable if they acted with actual malice.

Common Questions

Below are some common questions you might want to consider when meeting with an attorney for the first time.

  1. How do you prove defamation?
  2. Who has the burden of proof in a defamation case?
  3. Who can you sue for defamation?
  4. What damages are available if I win a defamation lawsuit?

Finding the Right Attorney for Your Needs

It is important to approach the right type of attorney—someone who can help you through your entire case. To do so, you can visit the Super Lawyers directory, and use the search box to find a lawyer based on your legal issue or location.

To help you get started, you may want to consider looking for a lawyer who has experience with defamation cases.

Why Should I Talk to a Lawyer?

Defamation cases can be complex because they involve constitutional law and occasionally state law. An experienced lawyer will know what you need to prove and the best way to prove it. Your lawyer will gather necessary documentation to help you show how your reputation was affected (or not affected, if you are the defendant), and they will interview potential witnesses for you.

A lawyer will be able to anticipate potential problems with your case and advise you on how to approach them. Your lawyer will also keep track of deadlines and file all the paperwork with the necessary courts and agencies, giving you one less thing to worry about.

Why Super Lawyers?

Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The patented selection process includes independent research, peer nominations and peer evaluations. The objective is to create a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of outstanding attorneys that can be used as a resource for attorneys and consumers searching for legal counsel. As Super Lawyers is intended to be used as an aid in selecting a lawyer, we limit the lawyer ratings to those who can be hired and retained by the public. You can learn more about the selection process here.

Other Featured Articles

Civil Rights Icon Civil Rights

What Is Disparate Impact Discrimination?

A Minnesota lawyer weighs in on a lesser-known aspect of discrimination

Civil Rights Icon Civil Rights

Navigating the Legal System When You're Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Guidance for Minnesotans seeking to overcome barriers to legal access

View More Civil Rights Articles »

Page Generated: 0.068879127502441 sec