Beyond the Water Cooler
When tensions reach the breaking point between bosses and employees, it’s time for the lawyers to sort things out
Published in 2007 Michigan Super Lawyers magazine
on September 14, 2007
Updated on March 11, 2016
No doubt, there are offices and factories where the atmosphere between managers and workers is collegial and cooperative. But the workplace can also be a tad less idyllic, marked by an Us vs. Them divide. It doesn’t take much to tip the balance from Dilbert-like bemusement to animosity.
When someone crosses a legal line, negotiating the fallout requires attorneys with a thorough knowledge of employment law, the patience to sift through conflicting stories and the tenacity to reach the best conclusion for everyone involved.
Detroit-area lawyers Joseph Golden and Reginald Turner represent opposing sides in the labor debate but share a common interest: making the workplace more harmonious.
Watch Joseph Golden enter a room and you might, as he admits, be taken aback. At 66, Golden has a long, full beard—now more salt than pepper—and a penchant for working in jeans. He is personable and relaxed, and laughs easily. But don’t be fooled: Golden is also one of Michigan’s savviest plaintiffs’ attorneys in employment and labor law. At an age that might have others contemplating retirement, he recently won the biggest verdict of his career.
Even his adversary in that case, attorney Michael D. Ritenour, then with Thomas, DeGrood & Witenoff in Southfield, and now a solo practitioner, describes Golden as “one of the best, most honorable, most skilled attorneys I have ever encountered. And that comes from a guy who lost to the tune of $2.4 million!”
Ritenour didn’t start out so impressed. “When I first met him, because of the very long, white beard—and at the time I met him he also had a ponytail—it was very disconcerting. It leads you to think he’s not going to do well in front of the jury, that his appearance will become a focus as opposed to what he has to say. I found that not to be the case. In our particular case, certainly, the jury, as measured by the verdict, wasn’t put off by him at all. I don’t think his appearance became any kind of a factor. In fact, I think it becomes an asset to him, because he can use it to put people at ease, to joke a little bit about it.”
Golden has no plans to slow down.
“I love what I do,” he says. “So long as I have the ability and the capacity to meet my responsibilities to my clients, I’m going to keep doing this.”
Golden’s initial interest in law was sparked more by drama than debate. “I was always interested in performing,” he says. “I always liked the stage, never had any problem with speaking in front of a group.” During college, part-time jobs helped him discover a fondness for sales and working closely with people. Golden decided that all of these skills would “play well as an attorney.”
After graduating from Wayne State University, Golden went on to the University of Detroit School of Law. After working at various Detroit-based firms and running his own practice, he spent 22 years at Sommers Schwartz before joining Pitt, McGehee, Palmer, Rivers & Golden as a partner this year.
Golden has been involved in labor and employment litigation virtually from the start. It feels like a natural fit, he says. He credits his urban upbringing for his ability to communicate well with working people. “If you went to public school in Detroit and grew up in an integrated neighborhood, I think you’ve got a little bit of ‘street’ in you. I think that helps me tremendously.”
Nowhere have Golden’s legal skills been more on display than in the case of his most famous client, the late Bo Schembechler, who gained fame as a winning football coach at the University of Michigan. But it was his dismissal by the Detroit Tigers baseball team, of which he served briefly as president after leaving U of M, that brought him to Golden’s door.
In 1992, Schembechler was fired via fax after only two years with the Tigers. He claimed the organization had initially agreed he would head the team until 2000. “He was to finish his working life with the Tigers, until age 70,” Golden told the media at the time. “Bo was prepared to honor the 10-year commitment; the Tigers, obviously, were not.” The parties ended up settling, to Schembechler’s satisfaction, though he did not stay on with the Tigers.
“I received tremendous notoriety in that case,” Golden says. “Not only because Bo was such a legend, but because we appeared to be opposites. One of the first things he was asked by the sports columnists was, ‘How did you find a guy with a full beard—and why?’ He had a rule for his team that they couldn’t have facial hair.” But the two hit it off from their first meeting. Schembechler had a series of appointments lined up with potential attorneys, with Golden at the top. After the two spoke, the coach canceled his other interviews. “Our relationship was excellent,” Golden says, “and I’ll always be thankful for him coming here. To this day, people come to see me and they say, ‘Well, if you’re good enough for Bo, you’re good enough for me.’”
Though Schembechler’s case never went to trial, Golden has spent plenty of time in the courtroom over the years. That’s when he taps into his passion for performing. But over the past decade, most of Golden’s cases have settled out of court and trials have been fairly rare events. Still, when he has the opportunity, he wrings the most from the experience. In 2006, in his first jury trial since 1999, Golden won a verdict of $2.4 million in federal court for Agnes Auvenshine.
Auvenshine, a probationary teacher at Troy Athens High School, had been rated “fully satisfactory” during her first year. Under a new principal, problems arose.
“My client contended that there were four comments made by Principal Catherine Cost that went directly to her national origin [China] as it related to her ability to be a successful teacher. For example, Auvenshine was applying for a job [at the school] for which she was certified. The job went to a woman who wasn’t certified. My client directly raised with Cost the fact that she thought her national origin played a role in the decision not to hire her. She contended that Cost said, ‘Well, maybe it did, but that’s my decision.’ Well, that’s direct evidence of discrimination.
“The jury not only believed that my client had been discriminated against but acquired some distaste for the principal. The award was approximately $1.2 million against both the school district and the principal, including $600,000 in punitives against the principal.”
Golden notes that, these days, 99 percent of his cases never go to trial. “The advent of ADR [alternative dispute resolution], which basically has forced mediation for all of these cases, has resulted in many more cases being resolved,” he says. But there may be another reason: He had two verdicts in excess of $1 million when he tried cases in 1999. Golden believes that fact has also prompted defendants to resolve cases before they reach a jury. “Which is why I say the Auvenshine verdict helped me significantly,” he says with a laugh. “Maybe I won’t have to try another case for seven years.”
Then he pauses, reflecting. “I did some of my best work in that case. It made me feel that, although I’ve been doing this for close to 40 years, I hadn’t lost any of my skills. That’s important, because I enjoy this practice. The only thing that would really alter my desire to practice is if I felt my skills were diminishing.”
One-time adversary Ritenour says, “Joe Golden knows what he’s doing. His word is his bond. He’s a genuinely decent guy. It’s rare that you encounter somebody in our profession that you can say all those things about—especially when you’ve lost.”
Backing the boss
Defense attorney Reginald Turner, 47, also specializes in employment and labor law, but with a different client: the employer. Turner and Golden haven’t crossed career paths, but if they did, they might find they have a lot in common: Both grew up in Detroit, graduated from Wayne State and started their careers representing employees.
Turner, a partner with Clark Hill and the immediate past president of the National Bar Association, represented unions for 10 years. At Clark Hill, which he joined in 2000, he represents employers. “I believe my previous experience is valuable to my clients,” he says. “I understand the issues from a variety of perspectives.”
Clearly, Turner’s background gives him insight into employer/employee disputes. But it was a career move that many plaintiffs’ attorneys, including Golden, can’t imagine making.
“There were two principal reasons why I made that switch,” Turner says. “First, I wanted the intellectual challenge of growing my practice through representing clients on the other side, in the business community. Second, I began developing a government-relations practice, and I saw Clark Hill as a very good base from which to grow that practice. Its labor and employment group was very strong and, with a lot of work by a lot of folks, it has become even stronger today.”
His employer-clients are glad Turner made the move.
“I first met Reggie 20 years ago or so, when he was a summer intern here on the GM legal staff,” says Frank Jaworski, managing attorney for labor personnel matters at General Motors. “So I’ve known him since he was in law school. … He has the temperament and personality to be effective with both his client as well as with the opposition.”
Neither side of the employment debate was originally on Turner’s radar. “At an early age, I wanted to be a police officer, like my father,” says Turner, whose father once served as Detroit’s deputy chief of police. Then a job at United Parcel Service during his undergraduate years triggered Turner’s interest in labor and employment relations. He went on to the University of Michigan Law School, taking all the labor- and employment-law courses he could.
Turner has seen his two interests—law enforcement and the law—intersect in the employment arena.
“I’ve had a number of trials over the last few years for a municipal employer in which we’ve defended decisions to discharge police officers who were violating employer policy—and, in some cases, violating the law,” says Turner. “In one case, a police officer was hanging out with the wrong crowd. The matter came to a head when it was discovered that one of the members of this crowd was a person who was wanted by his department.” The officer, says Turner, didn’t reveal the man’s whereabouts to his police agency. “In another case, we were able to uphold the discharge of a police officer with a substance-abuse problem that was affecting his work. Despite repeated chances, he had failed to correct the problem.
“As the son of a police officer, I understand the importance of the code of ethics for law-enforcement officers.”
While representing defendants these days, Turner is committed to improving the workplace for everyone.
“The law is pretty well settled,” he says. “Employers know what they can and can’t do.” Where there is confusion on an employer’s part, Turner and his team offer assistance, “to help them create a work environment that is free of bias and provides employees with equal employment opportunities.
“Occasionally, mistakes occur. A great deal of my value to my clients is helping them to correct the mistake so they can continue to manage their core business rather than spending time litigating matters.”
Like Golden, Turner sees most disputes settled before they come to trial.
“I think the trend toward alternative dispute resolution has been good for our clients in many cases,” he notes. “I’m finding, however, that lawyers and clients are re-evaluating the efficacy of alternative dispute resolution for certain types of cases.” Turner questions whether mediation offers the same protections for both sides in more traditional settlements or trials. “It’s possible that the pendulum may swing back a bit toward conventional litigation.”
Regardless, it seems inevitable that workers and their bosses are destined to continue finding themselves on opposite sides of many issues as they confront a mutually uncertain future. “Labor and management have both been challenged by the globalization of the economy and the opportunities it provides for growth, along with the obstacles created by the need to change old practices in order to meet global competition,” Turner says. Rising health-care costs and the need for more efficiency are among the challenges.
These are particularly significant issues in the dramatic ebb-and-flow economy of the metro Detroit area. The automotive industry is a prime example of a sector that has struggled to stay afloat.
“Growing up in southeastern Michigan gives me a unique perspective on the way labor and employment law impacts the economy and the quality of life in the region,” Turner says. “In order for our manufacturing industry to be healthy and provide jobs, there has to be a delicate balance between creating a good quality of life for employees and ensuring that employers can receive a return on investment that will allow the industries to continue to be viable.”
Turner also has a passion for equality—which has inspired civic and political activism.
“Reggie is certainly a leader in the community,” says Casandra Ulbrich, senior director of development at Wayne State University and an elected member, along with Turner, of the Michigan State Board of Education. Ulbrich points to Turner’s opposition to a proposed ban on affirmative action, which was on the ballot when he ran for the Board of Education. “He risked his own political race to help out in this other cause that he felt so passionately about,” says Ulbrich.
Despite a long list of civic activities, Turner never takes his eye off the ball. “Employment and labor law is just a fascinating area,” he says. “In addition to the dollars-and-cents issues, there are human stories involved in almost every case. While the issues are complex, they never take you too far away from people.”
On that point, Reginald Turner and Joseph Golden see eye to eye.