Considering a Land Installment Contract in Ohio
Alternative financing arrangements can have advantages—and disadvantages
By Judy Malmon, J.D. | Last updated on January 27, 2023Use these links to jump to different sections:
If you’re buying or selling a house, certain procedures and traditional financing options are so commonplace they’re unquestioned in many transactions. But, because the purchase or sale of real property is one of the most significant financial events in a person’s life, a one-size-fits-all solution is hardly ever the best choice One arrangement worth considering, whether you’re the buyer or the seller, is a land installment contract or installment sale.What It Is

Pros and Cons: Buyer
A land contract can be attractive to a buyer because:- There are no origination fees or closing costs, which can save thousands of dollars
- Often a smaller down payment is required
- The buyer can’t get a mortgage due to poor credit, inadequate employment history or other reasons, but yet can manage regular monthly payments
- The process is quicker, simpler and more flexible than bank financing
- Interest can be deducted like regular mortgage interest
- Having a direct relationship with the seller can allow for flexible negotiation on terms of the contract, like price, payment schedule, monthly installment price, pre-payment options, title encumbrances and improvements
- The buyer doesn’t own the property until the final payment, and forfeiture of all payments in the event of default
- Disclosures about the property aren’t required, and risks include an excessive price, back real estate taxes or undisclosed liens on the title
- Buyer arranges for title examination, title insurance, appraisal and inspection
- Risk of seller abuse, meaning high interest rates or large balloon payments that increase potential default
- Considerably shorter time to cure default than with a traditional mortgage (40 days in the Ohio revised code, as opposed to six months)
- Using installment payments to improve your credit for a mortgage can depend on the seller reporting payments to a credit agency
- Seller isn’t required to maintain good legal title until transfer of title on full payment
Pros and Cons: Seller
Upsides for a seller to consider:- The sale can be quick and save costs
- Title examination, appraisal and disclosures are the responsibility of the buyer
- Can be a good option for selling non-conforming property that wouldn’t qualify for financing
- Can earn regular income from real estate, potentially while still paying on the seller’s mortgage (with approval of mortgage lender)
- If the buyer defaults, the process to reclaim is quicker than foreclosure; the seller may keep all money paid and also reclaim the property if the buyer has made payments for less than five years
- Property, and potentially a mortgage, will remain in your name for many years during term of contract
- Seller won’t receive all their money until completion of contract
- A contract for deed will take more ongoing obligation than would an outright sale
What do I do next?
Enter your location below to get connected with a qualified attorney today.Additional Real Estate articles
Attorney directory searches
Helpful links
Find top lawyers with confidence
The Super Lawyers patented selection process is peer influenced and research driven, selecting the top 5% of attorneys to the Super Lawyers lists each year. We know lawyers and make it easy to connect with them.
Find a lawyer near you